Community Engagement

Liverpool City Council's  draft Statement of Community Involvement says that  to  provide good governance  the Council "must listen  to and learn from its citizens..."
Yet the Council refused to listen to and examine evidence from residents when it did not fit in with preconceived plans.
When this genuine, new residents' action group was formed the Council restricted its dialogue to its prior cosy relationship with another (also genuine) residents' group - WDC.

In March 2004 the Welsh Streets Home Group (WSHG) was formed to reflect the need for a rethink on wholescale demolition.

Evidence will be assembled here to show how the City Council and its partners missed successive opportunities to engage with residents who supported that view.

WSHG has itself provided evidence to the House of Commons Select Committee which describes the flaws in the consultation process for the Welsh Streets project and suggests reforms to prevent similar misfortunes elsewhere.

And by omission or otherwise, the City Council allowed toxic divisions to grow within the resident community; they allowed opponents of demolition to be misrepresented and denigrated without redress.

The Executive Member for Housing was asked to take responsibility and seek to redeem this failure in community cohesion, but as the Question to Council and its Answer reveals, she appeared to claim the Council had (an entirely bogus!) equidistance between WDC and WSHG.  The appearance of the WDC logo alongside logos for City Council and their partners clearly show the proposal to be a joint enterprise with WDC - see an example.

A list of some contemporary newsletters is published here.  Readers will be able to compare their tone and content.

Comparison of Contemporary Newsletters

Welsh Streets Home Group
WDC (Windermere, Dovetail, Camelot)